Document B · section 2
Two versions. One change.
The review now needs a named owner.
Compare the approved documents. Keep the quoted evidence beside the finding.
Supported by the supplied text
AI for Research
Find the evidence.
Keep the judgment.
We build AI research workflows that search, structure, compare, summarize, and surface evidence — while keeping the analyst in control.
Show us the research workflowQuestion: what changed between these documents?
Follow the evidence
Document A · earlier version
“Submit the review to the team.”
Document B · revised version
“Submit the review to a named owner.”
Documents A + B
A date is not in the source.
When does the new process take effect?
Neither document gives an effective date. Flag the gap rather than filling it with an assumption.
Needs analyst follow-up
Evidence and open questions travel with the draft
A draft is not a conclusion.
The ownership requirement changed; timing remains unconfirmed.
The analyst checks the source versions, resolves the missing information, and signs off on the final output.
Final interpretation stays with the analyst
The work behind the work
Finding is not the same as knowing.
Research gets faster when people stop spending hours just finding and organizing the material.
- finding sources
- collecting documents
- extracting facts
- comparing versions
- organizing notes
- tracking citations
- summarizing long material
- repeating the same monitoring
Where AI can help
Start with useful work.
Good candidates, grouped by the work they support. The starting point depends on your process, data, and controls.
Find
- Internal knowledge search
- Market research
- Regulatory research
Understand
- Document comparison
- Evidence extraction
- Source-linked summaries
Stay informed
- Competitive monitoring
- Recurring intelligence briefs
How it works
From a question
to a defensible draft.
Search, structure, compare, summarize, and surface evidence. Keep the analyst in control of the conclusion.
- Question
- Approved sources
- Retrieval
- Extract evidence
- Compare / organize
- Draft synthesis
- Analyst review
- Final output
Traceability
“Where did this
come from?”
A good research system makes that question easy to answer. Traceability is part of the workflow, not a footnote added later.
- Source links + quoted evidence
Keep the document and supporting passage close to the claim, so the analyst can check the original.
- Document-level permissions
Retrieve only the material the person is allowed to see. Access boundaries apply before synthesis.
- Confidence flags + missing-information alerts
Make uncertainty and gaps visible instead of smoothing them into a confident paragraph.
- Human review
The analyst checks the evidence, interprets what it means, and owns the final output.
What to measure
Make the improvement visible.
Possible measures, not promised results. Establish your baseline first, then test whether the workflow improves.
- time to first draft
- source coverage
- retrieval accuracy
- analyst review time
- recurring monitoring effort
- citation completeness
Your next move
Start with the research task your team repeats every week or every month.
Show us how your team gathers and checks sources today. We’ll show you where AI can do the finding, so analysts keep the judgment.
Tell us what’s slowing you down.
A few lines is enough. We’ll reply by email with what’s worth doing first.